you and no one else

Dear Readers,
The other night I watched Into the Wild. It’s based on the book of the same name by Jon Krakauer and tells the true life story of Christopher McCandless. In 1990 he burned his money and identity cards, gave away his savings, and wandered for two years before walking unprepared into the Alaskan wilderness where he died of starvation.
Wikipedia and Jon K. tell us that Chistopher McCandless’s death could have been prevented if he had packed a compass and adequate supplies. Or if he hadn’t deliberately forgone a map, which would have shown him the town within a day’s walk of camp. Or if he knew how to turn a moose into jerky, or forage for adequate food. It was a conditional death; the eulogies are filled with “ifs.”
His story provokes schismatic reactions: you either hate him for being a stupid R/romantic kid who got himself killed, or you worship him as an E/enlightened prophet. To the former camp, he inspires far more ire than, say, a serial drunk driver who smashes into a telephone pole, or a longtime smoker with terminal lung cancer. In those cases you could also say that those people did it to themselves, stupidly. But they rarely get editorial-length takedowns the way that Christopher McCandless has. No, there is special rancor reserved for dreamers.
Naturally, I’m more on the latter side of the schism (Go Dreamers!), but I see Chris McCandless in the context of my larger pet problem of modern maturity. My culture, the middle-class American (white) culture, has no rites of passage that put life and body on the line. It’s easy to sustain adolescence over an entire lifetime. (Study Question: How many mature, functioning adults are there in the workplace? In your workplace?)
And so back to Christopher McCandless. Twenty-two years old and a path before him of easy adolescence stretched out in long cash-lined decades. Eff that. So he improvised a transformative rite of passage, one that truly put his life and body on the line. And he messed it up.
But if he had come out of it? I think he would be one of the more premium, mature human beings you or I would ever meet, dreamer or not1.
as a side note
The other week I nearly threw a for-real tantrum, like an out-of-control tantrum, because I needed clean underwear and I was about to miss my train and the laundry key was just in my hand I swear and now where is it? WhErrE IsIT?! And I did not go as far into tantrum as I was prepared to go that day, but I was prepared to go all the way. I’m almost 30 years old. Really, self?
Sometimes I frame “the maturity problem” as how to achieve self-actualization or secular enlightenment. But on a much more basic, and urgent level, I mean maturity as an even keel in all emotional weather. Spilled milk might cause a child to cry, but the adult just gets a paper towel, and wipes it up. Just think: all problems could be met with just as little anxiety, fear, and hesitation.
1Oh I am fully (fully) cognizant of Insufferable Dreamers (IDs). Believe you me.

rassum frassum

Two chickens
Two chickens / chickens kneel before you / that’s what I said now
Dear Readers,
I am the worst kind of grammar nerd: uptight and nerdy about grammar and yet I’ve never properly learned grammar myself. This blog, Dear Readers, must certainly be filled with dangling participles, passive verbs, tense mishigas, “who” instead of “whum,” and other grammerrors I do not comprehend. I am the worst. I know this.
Two Four usage errors that vex me most mightily:
“very unique”
“unique” means “singular.” It means it’s the only one. A thing can’t be “very unique.” That’s like saying that twins are “very double.” “Those are the doubliest twins I’ve ever seen!”
I usually let this one slide because I know what the speaker means, and I don’t have an elegant construction to replace it. Either the speaker means, “several standard deviations outside the norm, an outlier in the field” or the person means, “a euphemism for ‘makes me uncomfortable.’”
“you think too much” “you’re crazy”
Not grammar points per se, but I’m throwing these two in right now because they similarly mean, “a euphemism for ‘you make me uncomfortable.’”
The next time someone says, “you think too much,” try, “you mean I think too much for you.” The next time someone says, “you’re crazy,” and you believe that the person is due for some razzing, try a deadpan, “really? I’ve never gotten that before.” And if the person takes the bait and says, “really?” then deliver a super-intense, “no! I get it all the FACKING time! [big smile]” This doesn’t alter the person’s perception of you as crazy, but it does get the person to stop talking. So, mission accomplished.
“verbally” instead of “orally”
Ok this one drives me batty! “Do you have a contract?” “Only a verbal one.” Argh!
“verbal” means “made of words.” Written and spoken contracts are BOTH verbal. Written and spoken contracts are both verbal. Here’s what Wikipedia has to say about unspoken contracts and implied-in-fact contracts. Those are non-verbal contracts. The contracts made of paper, signed in ink? Unless they’re written in Wingdings by a monkey, those are verbal contracts.
Ok and so what is the elegant construction to replace this usage error? There’s “spoken contract” or “spoken agreement.” My favorite is “oral agreement.”